Crystal introduced me to a book recently, and though I am barely a third of the way through, it is already revolutionizing how I understand architecture. I often hear architects or designers say they like or don't like certain buildings, and I've often wanted to know why. Even for myself, there are buildings I do or don't like, but I don't always know why. The below quotes are just one theory on beauty, but I find them to be very helpful so far.
"To describe a building as beautiful therefore suggests more than a mere aesthetic fondness; it implies an attraction to the particular way of life this structure is promoting through its roof, door handles, window frames, staircase and furnishings. A feeling of beauty is a sign that we have come upon a material articulation of certain of our ideas of a good life. Similarly, buildings will strike us as offensive not because they violate a...visual preference but because they conflict with our understanding of the rightful sense of existence..." (72)
"The notion of buildings that speak helps us to place at the very centre of our architectural conundrums the question of the values we want to live by - rather than merely of how we want things to look." (73)
The Architecture of Happiness - Alain de Botton (2006 McClelland & Stewart Ltd.; Toronto)
I often differ in my preference of buildings with the architects and designers at work, and now I am starting to understand why. My natural tendency is too long for a former way of life that I have never known, which might explain why I prefer classical designs, one of which is Gothic, which I've looked at in my two previous posts.
Which of these buildings do you prefer? (click on the image to see a larger version of it)
Grayson Manor - Moose Jaw, SK or Villa Savoye - Poissy, France
4 comments:
I'm assuming you wanted some feedback. Grayson Manor is my pick. It was a bit of an instant pull.
I had to think longer about the reasons though. Perhaps it was more familiar, cozy, less juxtaposed against its surroundings. Then I though about the openness of the windows in the other one and how, from inside-out, it might be more enveloped and entwined.
It's hard for me to separate design from function - Grayson Manor is the more appealing design, but living in an old house is not without it's quirks and frustrations (as our 1949 home can attest) so functionally I'd prefer to live in Villa Savoye.
It may be interesting to note that:
a) Grayson Manor was built in 1911, whereas Villa Savoye was built in 1929. This makes them almost the same age, so one can't say that one building is that much older than the other.
b) Villa Savoye was designed by a famous architect (La Corbusier), but the roof leaked so badly that the owners nearly sued him, and the mold made their child sick. Thus, it wasn't all that functional as a building.
I also find it interesting that both of your intial reaction was to find grayson manor more visually appealing...really interesting.
Villa Savoye..all theway.......
kris...
Post a Comment